96 South Main Street, PO Box 77, Nephi, Utah 84648 - Voice: 435 623-0525 - FAX: 435 623-4735

On our front page this week


  • Group tells commission they want industrial growth area plan


By Myrna Trauntvein
Times-News Correspondent

Three women attended Juab County Commission to request that commissioners begin the process of developing an industrial growth plan for the county.

Kristie McKay, Deanna Hatch, and Tanya Esplin asked commissioners, first of all, if there was such a plan, and secondly, if not, if they would work toward developing a plan.

"May I implore you to identify areas where industrial growth may be located in Juab County and to get a plan in place?" asked McKay.

The Williams Company proposal for location of a terminal station north east of Nephi was only the first of many such plans county government would need to deal with in the future, said Tanya Esplin.

Esplin, Alice Ricks, and Dana Young all met with Nephi City Council members a week ago and were told the county planning commission and county commissioners would be the first to address, through their permitting process, the terminal facility. However, McKay suggested, the county needed to have an industrial growth plan.

"I agree with you," said Robert Steele, commissioner. "I think development of an industrial growth plan needs to be addressed."

The county master plan does not include an industrial growth area, he said, although Nephi City does have such a plan in place.

"So far," said Joseph Bernini, commissioner, "anytime industrial growth moved into the county it has located near Nephi. As industrial growth moved in, Nephi moved out expanding its borders to include the new development."

McKay said, in her opinion, it would be better to cluster industry together away from the primary residential areas of the county.

"We have had a citizen request that an industrial growth zone be established," said Robert Steele, commissioner. "The next step is to take the request to the planning commission and see if they are willing to do it.

If the planning commission is willing, then an area would need to be identified and the proposal would then be open for public hearings.

Steele sits, as commission representative, on the county planning commission. "The need for an industrial area in the county has been brought to the commission's attention and now the proposal will be taken to the planning commission."

The decision of where to locate such an industrial area is dependent on many factors, said Steele. Industry is dependent on quick access to transportation, likes to locate near a railroad, and prefers services such as water, sewer, natural gas, electricity and telephone service.

Some ideas which the planning commission may need to consider, such as railway access, may not be popular with local residents. For example, said Steele, if the railroad corridor west of highway U.S. 91 were to be considered as an area for industrial growth that may not be popular with residents of East Juab County.

"It is a good idea to have a place to steer some company if they came in seeking to develop an industry," said Steele.

"Has the Williams Company identified any alternate sites for their proposed terminal station?" asked Esplin.

"We do know that there will be alternate sites," said Steele. "The person who was ultimately in charge indicated that he was disgusted with his staff for the site selection they had made."

"I think the Williams Company will try to work with the county economic development commission and will also give us, county commissioners, some opportunities to comment," he said.