96 South Main Street, PO Box 77, Nephi, Utah 84648 - Voice: 435 623-0525 - FAX: 435 623-4735

On our front page this week

  • Ongoing dispute heats up Levan council meeting


By Rebecca Dopp
Times-News Correspondent

Who has the rights to Rosebush Spring? This question is still unanswered and still a very hot topic with Levan Town council and the Levan Irrigation Company.

Golden Mangelson, president of the irrigation company, offered a stipulated judgement for the council to consider. He said that it would be an opportunity to settle the case out of court.

The two entities are in dispute over a claim on water in Rosebush Spring. The town filed a diligence claim on the water after being told by the state that nobody owned it. The irrigation company says that they have the claim on the water and that the town filed on it illegally. He said the only way to fight the diligence claim was in a court of law.

According to Mr. Mangelson, he feels the diligence claim is inaccurate and what it does is ask for more water than the town has. He said the state engineer, on the last issue of water use by the town on Cobble Rock Spring, put a writer on that and said under no circumstances was the town to increase their water right above the current water right.

He felt the town applied for an additional flow of water that did not belong to them,but belonged to the irrigation company.

Mr. Mangelson stated that the judgement would have the court adjudicate the water rights of the town and the irrigation company. He said that this judgement explains that the town should have a right to Rosebush Spring, and should be able to take .78 of a second foot from the spring, if they want to, as well as taking that amount from Tunnel Spring or the town well. The other water right the town could use would be from Cobble Rock Spring which already belongs to Levan Irrigation Company. He also stated that if the town uses that water then it should be replaced at the head of the irrigation system.

He feels that this stipulation agreement will correct the discrepancy and lay out the rights of the town and the irrigation company and adjudicates them so that the town has the opportunity to take the water out of those sources and the irrigation company holds the rest of the water in Chicken Creek.

Ryan Aagard stated that according to the State of Utah, Levan, right now, holds the right to Rosebush Spring and doesn't need to have the permission of the irrigation company to use the water.

"According to Mr. Forebush (state engineer), the claim right now is legal and binding," Mr. Aagard said. "Why in the world would Levan, who is sitting on a 1.25 water right want to go to court to get a .78 water right?"

Mr. Aagard said that he knew a water attorney in Salt Lake City who could look at the issue and make an informed opinion as to what the town should do. He said this attorney would give the town his advice on how to pursue this matter.

He said that the attorney told him he would charge the town $1,500 for his services. Mr. Aagard felt this was money well spent if it cleared up the whole dispute. He also said that if the attorney came back and said that the town had no right to file on the claim then he would drop the whole issue.

If the two parties fight this matter in court, then it will cost the residents of Levan a considerable amount of money. Most people present at the meeting agreed with Mr. Aagard in hiring an attorney to look over the claims. They felt that this issue needed to be taken care of as soon as possible.

The original claim by the city was made in August of 2001.

The crowd persuaded the Mayor and councilmen Paul Mangelson and Ralph Brooks to vote for the town to hire a water attorney, up to $2,000, to look into the matter. Councilman Rod Wankier did not vote due to a time conflict.