96 South Main Street, PO Box 77, Nephi, Utah 84648 - Voice: 435 623-0525 - FAX: 435 623-4735

On our front page this week


  • Nephi City will not provide services unless developments are annexed into city first!


By Myrna Trauntvein
Times-News Correspondent

Nephi City Council members are not interested in supplying culinary water to a development west of the community unless the owners are willing to annex into the city first.

In addition, council members indicated that, were a vote taken, council members would not favor paying for nor contributing to the payment of building the water-conveying system.

Dell Chryst, representing Hans Braun, who is interested in developing a conference center, asked council members how they would react to the request for the city to help pay for installation of the culinary water delivery system.

"The county has approved the project depending on the water supply," said Chryst. "We wanted to see what you think. We are not opposed to annexation but we do not want to wait for that lengthy process to begin work on the project."

Brent Bowles, council member, said that the policy of the city was to have the property annexed to the city before city services were supplied. It was also policy that a developer pay all costs for the construction and addition of city services to the property.

"What would the citizens get out of supplying water to your project?" asked Kent Park, council member.

Chryst said that, down the road, there would be increased business resulting from the development. "This is a bedroom community," he said. "We are trying to bring people from all over the world here to our facility."

Those visitors would utilize city businesses and would contribute to the cash-flow in the community.

The development would also connect to the community sewer system.

If the city were to split costs of laying the culinary water pipe to the center, it would benefit the residents of the community in the long run. In addition, those who built between the development and the city could use the line.

"It works out best for the person doing the development to pay the costs of installing the culinary water delivery system," said Chad Brough, city council member. "Others who come in later and connect to the system then pay back a percentage of the installation costs to the first person to put in the line."

Not too long ago, said Brough, the water department superintendent came into the council and reported that the sewer lagoons were nearly full and further development of that source might need to be made in the near future.

Chryst said the development was investigating the cost to the project of drilling a well in order to supply water but would much prefer to connect to the city water and sewer system.

"If you do annex, you will get culinary water, but you will still be responsible for paying for the water delivery line being laid&emdash;you will stand the cost," said Brough.

While they understood the desire the development owners had to make the process shorter and quicker, culinary water for the project depended on annexation and annexation took time because state statutes must be followed.

Park said he understood. "We were in the same situation when the south interchange was developed."

Mike Jones, council member, said he, too, understood. "I was the same way and Bill Westfall was the same way. We all want to hurry the process but annexation take time."