96 South Main Street, PO Box 77, Nephi, Utah 84648 - Voice: 435 623-0525 - FAX: 435 623-4735

On our front page this week

  • On, Off, now On Again


By Myrna Trauntvein
Times-News Correspondent

Yes, the boy's home can be built in Mona after all.

Mayor Bryce Lynn had, originally, the opinion that there were no business licenses allowed in R-1, except for those which were termed "small non-impact home businesses."

That is true. However, a boy's home is considered the same as a residence or a school and is an allowed use in a residential zone. Under state statute, it is not considered a business at all.

"We settled out of court," said Cory Squire, council member.

When David Starling, representing the boy's home, attended Mona City Council meeting in November to get a business license he was turned down.

"It doesn't qualify," said Lynn at the time. "In my way of thinking, it's not going to happen."

Lynn said, that at a previous meeting, the attorney for the boy's home had threatened the city with a law suit if they failed to allow the home, which Lynn thought of as a business.

Madolyn Liebing, operator of the proposed home, made good on that threat and filed a lawsuit against the city. Following receipt of the notice of that suit, Mona Council held an executive session of council meeting to discuss the threat.

"Our lawyer offered his advice," said Cory Squire, council member. "We agreed to follow that advice."

Phil Lowry, city attorney, counseled the city that a business license was not needed for the boy's home. Rather the home only needed local approval in the form of an occupancy permit.

His advice was heeded by the city council who offered little discussion about what had happened behind closed doors except to say that the boy's home could open and operate in Mona.

The occupancy permit, required by the state in order for Liebing to operate the home, was granted.

Neither Liebing nor Starling were present at the council meeting held on Tuesday though Liebing's name was on the agenda.

"We took care of that item in executive session," said Lynn.

Nothing can be officially approved at a closed meeting though consensus of opinion can be reached. After discussion, decisions requiring a vote must be voted on in public.

"No closed meeting is allowed except as to matters exempted under Section 52-4-5; provided, no ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, contract, or appointment shall be approved at a closed meeting," reads the act.

Under terms of the so-called "Sunshine Law," Utah's Open and Public Meetings Act, discussions about pending litigation may be discussed in executive session.

A closed meeting may be held upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members of the public body present at an open meeting for which notice is given pursuant to Section 52-4-6; provided, a quorum is present.

"The reason or reasons for holding a closed meeting and the vote, either for or against the proposition to hold such a meeting, cast by each member by name shall be entered on the minutes of the meeting," reads the Act.

"A closed meeting may be held pursuant to Section 52-4-4 for any of the following purposes:

"(i) discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual;

"(ii) strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;

"(iii) strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; or

"(iv) strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property when public discussion of the transaction would disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration or prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms;

"(v) strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property when:

(A) public discussion of the transaction would disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration or prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms;

(B) the public body had previously given public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and

(C) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale;

"(vi) discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and

"(vii) investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.

(b) A public body may not interview a person applying to fill an elected position in a closed meeting.

(c) Nothing in this section may be construed to require any public body to approve the purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of real property if that public body is not required to approve the purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of real property under other laws."