96 South Main Street, PO Box 77, Nephi, Utah 84648 - Voice: 435 623-0525 - FAX: 435 623-4735

On our front page this week


  • Teacher evaluations set high standards for teaching staff and quality education for students


By Myrna Trauntvein
Times-News Correspondent

Juab School District Board of Education recently adopted a new method of teacher evaluation and the first groups of teachers had completed their evaluations.

"The evaluations turned out to be a positive experience," said Kirk Wright, superintendent. "The new approach, a team approach, emphasizes coaching as the key element."

He said the new evaluation procedure is about standards and there can be no standards without assessments matched to those standards. Teachers cannot improve teaching unless they know how well students are learning as measured against meaningful learning outcomes or results.

"Every three years an administrative team will evaluate the work of each individual, tenured teacher in the district on the Juab School District Teaching Rubric," said Wright.

As they perform the evaluations, the evaluating team will consider the teacher's planning for powerful learning results, instructional delivery, student results, and a self-assessment which will be given to the team both orally and in writing and will present the student learning that took place as a consequence of the work done.

"The team consists of three members, the teacher's principal and two others, who meet with the individual teachers and assess teachers according to the four major segments," said Wright.

Principals of the teachers being evaluated will continue to evaluate other aspects of the teacher's performance on an on-going basis. They will consider classroom management, professional development, adherence to school and district policy, and interpersonal relationships.

"Principals will become the primary players in coaching staff members in their buildings to prepare for the evaluation," said Wright.

Teachers not meeting the standards will continue to work with their principal and staff development instructors until they do meet district standards. As long as a teacher continues to address and demonstrate the capacity to make progress in deficient areas, the teacher will not be dismissed.

One thing the new method is designed to do, in particular, said Wright, is to enhance the principals' roles as instructional coaches.

Steve Olsen, middle school principal, said he thought the new evaluation process was highly effective.

"The process is the best opportunity for a positive impact on teaching that I have had in my career," said Olsen.

He said, according to what several teachers had told him, all of the teachers appreciated the new teacher evaluation process. When teachers get together with other teachers, the thought is that teachers like the new method.

"Teachers are starting to believe that it works," he said.

One of the purposes of the evaluation process, said Wright, is to provide district-wide focus on assessments and instructional activities that measure standard detailed in the College Board's, "What students should know and be able to do."

The process also helps the instructional staff develop quality assessments and instructional activities, helps report data that validates student achievement, provides reliability and validity to the process, formally recognizes and validates good teaching, identifies inservice needs, and provides district-wide consistency in the evaluation process.

"The team method of teacher evaluation provides help for staff who are not meeting certification standards, evaluates teachers for the purpose of keeping quality teachers on staff and formally recognizes good teaching," said Wright.