96 South Main Street, PO Box 77, Nephi, Utah 84648 - Voice: 435 623-0525 - FAX: 435 623-4735

On our front page this week

 

  • Annexation policy proposal returned to property owners for revisions


 

By Myrna Trauntvein
Times-News Correspondent

An annexation policy, proposed by Steve Kay and other property owners, was considered and sent back to the property owners for changes.

Cory Squire, council member, asked the council for feedback on the Steve Kay Annexation Agreement proposal, with the possibility of adopting it at Tuesday's meeting.

"This is the proposal we handed out last council meeting for review," said Squire.

However, Harry Newell, council member said he had some issues with the agreement and thought it needed some revisions. He had problems with some of the specifics and thought they should be addressed and changed.

"I couldn't see that the policy actually addressed certain things that could cause problems unless we take care of them," he said.

Newell said there were problems with the way the water right agreement and the zoning, among other things, were worded and said that they were not handled as he would like.

"The agreement is incomplete and we will need some legal review on those issues," said Newell. "We need to take a look at our own agreement and compare it with that one."

He said that there was no way he would agree to it being passed until it is more complete.

He also suggested the city attorney review the document before it is passed.

"I would love to see him annexed in, but there are certain things that are detrimental to us, unless we take care of them," he said.

Squire said that Kay was willing to do what was wanted. The attorney for Kay had been making a "shot-in-the-dark," he said.

"We will give them a copy of our annexation policy and say, 'Sorry, try again,'" said Squire.

Gordon Anderson, council member, agreed that the annexation agreement needed to be revised.

"We need our attorney to look at it," said Anderson, "before we adopt it."

The number of homes likely to be constructed in the annexed section would have an impact on many key infrastructure items, such as traffic flow, said Newell.

Kay does have a water tank, identical to the one the city has, said Allen Pay, so providing water for the subdivision which will likely follow the annexation shouldn't be a problem.

"His 350,000-gallon tank looks identical to ours," said Pay. "He has his own source."

Anderson said the annexed property needs to stay within the grid system the city has set up.

He also agreed that the possible loop-holes in the Kay annexation policy needed to be changed by Kay's attorney and then reviewed by the city attorney.

"The handbook prepared by the League of Cities and Towns, says that there are three things to go after legal counsel about," said Newell. "These are land use, water, and annexation."