96 South Main Street, PO Box 77, Nephi, Utah 84648 - Voice: 435 623-0525 - FAX: 435 623-4735

On our front page this week

  • Sale of properties in Eureka might jeopardize EPA clean-up


DON'T SELL • Paula Schmittdiel, EPA project manager and Steven Moores, Attorney for EPA region 8 talk with commissioners on Eureka properties that may be sold for taxes.

By Myrna Trauntvein
Times-News Correspondent

The EPA Eureka Mill project is not yet finished and if Juab County were to offer certain properties on an up-coming tax sale, the clean-up might be jeopardized.

Paula Schmittdiel, Remedial Project Manager with U.S. EPA Region 8 (EPR-SR), told commissioner that the primary owner of Chief Consolidated property had worked out an agreement with the EPA to allow use of property for the Superfund project and to sell some holdings to pay into an EPA clean-up fund.

That money would also go to pay back taxes on properties which would go for taxes if not paid.

"Chief may be able to satisfy tax and other liens if properties sold for fair market value or closer to fair market value," she said.

Chief also has properties in Utah County which may also be up for sale soon. However, Juab County Commissioners were told, those properties are much less critical to the cleanup than the ones in Juab County.

On-going exposures to lead contaminated soils will continue until the cleanup is completed, she said, and EPA hopes to minimize the duration of this exposure as much as possible.

"Today we have identified 50 kids with elevated levels of lead and arsenic," said Schmittdiel. "It does represent a significant health risk."

Shirl Nichols, county assessor, said that the state does have the county in a difficult spot. If the property, by state law, is not collected within the five-year period, the county is not allowed to collect any over that time period.

Laura Lockhart, Attorney with the Office of the Utah Attorney General, said she would look into the law for the county and would report back to them.

Her understanding of the law was that there was some sort of tolling agreement possible in cases such as this one.

"What you need to hear from us is that we want to work with you and we want you to complete your work," said Neil Cook, commission chairman.

The Eureka Mills site is located about 70 miles south of Salt Lake City in Juab County, Utah. The Eureka Valley was known as the Main Tintic District and was heavily mined from the 1880's to the 1950's.

Schmittdiel said that man, using the contaminated soil for fill through generations, had been a large contributing factor to the problem.

It was due to the high levels of lead and arsenic found through soil and indoor sampling, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed the Eureka Mills site for its National Priorities List (NPL) in June 2001.

Preliminary sampling conducted in July 2000 by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) and EPA found high levels of lead and arsenic in area soils. The State and EPA did more sampling on over 500 residential lots, as well as indoor sampling at over 50 homes.

"One thing Chief has is a lot of land," said Steve Moores, a Denver Office Attorney with EPA.

Attending the meeting with Schmittdiel, Lockhart and Moores were , Jude Hobza, U.S. Navy Corps of Engineers, and others.

Moore said that Chief was not paying for the clean-up but was allowing the use of the land. The EPA is now using land belonging to Chief Consolidated Mining as a dump site for the contaminated soil and will allow that use at a specially-constructed depository in the future.

They are also allowing the use of uncontaminated materials from the property to be used and have agreed to sell certain other pieces of property to earn funds to help with the clean-up of Superfund sites as that money goes into a special fund.

"If you sold the property now, it would take a long time for us to gain the needed access," said Schmittdiel. "That may slow the process. We would like you to defer the sale of the properties that we are actually using."

She said that, if the properties being used were sold, all cleanup would stop until the EPA negotiates access agreements with the new owners.

"A Superfund site is like an ocean liner, it can take forever to start up, but unlike an ocean liner, it can come to a stop very quickly," said Schmittdiel.

The costs of the cleanup, including states costs, will increase with those delays.

"The EPA requires a 10 percent match from the state," said Schmittdiel.

"Eureka will remain on the Superfund NPL until all cleanup is completed," she said."Eureka could have more economic draw since they have plenty of water."

The Eureka Mills site is located in the Tintic mining district where silver mills processed silver-bearing ore from the Eureka Hill Mine, Bullion Beck Mine, Gemini Mine, and the Centennial Eureka Mine. The area on and near to the mill sites includes the residential area of Eureka.

"The tax considerations need to be part of any plan involving Consolidated," said Nichols.

"We need some agreement with Chief Consolidated that they will hold the county harmless and will allow those back taxes to be paid," said Robert Steele, commissioner.

It was agreed that a list of the properties actually coming up for sale would be given the EPA representatives

In addition, the owner of the mining property will be contacted and a meeting arranged with all those present to be at that future meeting.

"We need Mr. Shriver to come to a meeting with us and sit down and talk about the issues and possible solutions," said Jared Eldridge, county attorney.

By state statute, the property must be advertised for sale in May or June, said Pat Ingram, county clerk/auditor.

That gives some time for a solution to be worked out but not a great deal of time.