96 South Main Street, PO Box 77, Nephi, Utah 84648 - Voice: 435 623-0525 - FAX: 435 623-4735

On our front page this week

  • Nephi City and Union Pacific Railroad officials discuss concerns over crossing signs


By Myrna Trauntvein
Times-News correspondent

Nephi City staff and council members will meet with Union Pacific Railroad officials to discuss signs the railroad has recently installed along the track which bisects town North to South on the west side of the community.

Both the railroad company and the city erect signs along the route where tracks and streets meet.

"Usually, when changes are made," said Randy McKnight, city administrator, "railroad personnel confer with the cities and consult the traffic plan of the community."

This time, the meeting did not take place in advance of the signs being changed by the railroad company.

"In reviewing the changes they made, we found some to be confusing to the motorist," said McKnight. "In addition, a sign of ours was removed."

Union Pacific Railroad officials were contacted about the changes and the concerns of Nephi staff members. As a result, officials of the railroad offered to meet with members of the council and city staff to discuss the changes which had been made.

Officials from the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) have also been invited to the meeting, said McKnight.

"We expressed our concerns and told officials of Union Pacific Railroad why we did not think the changes were appropriate," said McKnight. "They would like to meet with all of us to discuss our concerns."

"On 300 North and 500 North Streets, on the east side of the tracks, the cross-buck signs were moved from the existing advance-warning sign posts on the Nephi City east-west street right-of-way and relocated to a new sign post installed by Union Pacific adjacent to the tracks," said Randy McKnight, city administrator.

"Our opinion is that the new stop sign location is both confusing and dangerous," said McKnight.

The sign was confusing, he said, because it is only 40 feet on the West from an existing stop sign on the city east-west street right-of-way.

He and the city streets superintendent thought that the sign was dangerous because traffic stopping at the new stop sign was forced to stop in the traffic lanes of the north/south-bound traffic on 300 West Street.

McKnight said new stop signs were installed on private crossings at approximately 400 North and 600 North on 300 West Street.

"Traffic stopping at these signs also will be stopping in the north/south bound traffic lanes of 300 West Street," said McKnight.

On 500 North on the west side of the tracks, a post holding a stop sign, a cross-buck sign, and a dead-end sign was replaced.

"The dead-end sign was not reinstalled on the replacement post," said McKnight. "We want the dead-end sign replaced."

In addition, he said, the request was made, in writing, that Union Pacific remove the new stop signs.